Technical and economic evaluation of ambient and chilled aeration strategies to maintain the quality of paddy rice during storage in a tropical climate

Vortrag

Autor/innen

  • Alejandro Morales-Quiros Kansas State University, Grain Science & Industry, IGP, Manhattan, KS, U.S.A.
  • Carlos Campabadal Kansas State University, Grain Science & Industry, IGP, Manhattan, KS, U.S.A.
  • John Lawrence Kansas State University, Bulk Solids Innovation Center, Salina, KS, U.S.A.
  • Benjamin Plumier Iowa State University, Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, Ames. IA, U.S.A.
  • Dirk E. Maier Iowa State University, Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, Ames. IA, U.S.A.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5073/jka.2018.463.073

Schlagworte:

paddy rice, ambient aeration, grain chilling, economic feasibility

Abstract

Warm and moist conditions of some tropical climate regions make it difficult to use ambient aeration to cool stored grain, which contributes to pest problems and increases dependence on chemical control as part of grain management strategies. Grain chilling is a non-chemical alternative to cool grain stored under high risk climatic conditions. The objective of this research was to use computer simulation to evaluate the technical and economic viability of using grain chilling compared to four ambient aeration strategies developed for paddy rice stored under the tropical climatic conditions of the North Pacific coast of Costa Rica. The minimum grain temperature achieved through ambient aeration at the end of the six-month simulated storage period was 30.8°C, using an aeration strategy based on a grain-ambient temperature differential greater than 10°C. Grain chilling lowered the average grain temperature from 35°C to below 15°C in 117 hours and the maximum average temperature it registered after six months of storage was 15.5°C. The economic evaluation of the ambient aeration and chilling strategies determined that the operational costs of grain chilling were 1.83 US $/t lower than ambient aeration plus chemical control of pests. However, the initial cost of the grain chiller made the net present cost (NPC) of the grain chilling strategy 0.22 US $/t higher than the cost of ambient aeration plus chemical control over a 10-year analysis. Several potential financial options were analyzed to make the grain chiller economically feasible for a rice miller in Costa Rica.

Downloads

Veröffentlicht

2018-10-25