JfK Kopfgrafik
Home / Archiv / Bd. 67 Nr. 2 (2015) / Originalarbeit
Originalarbeit

Investigations on the Identification of Long Term Input of Phosphorus from Organic Sources by Standard Soil P Analysis

Untersuchungen zur Identifizierung von langfristigen Phosphoreinträgen aus organischen Materialien mittels standardisierter Boden-P-Analytik

Raghad Shwiekh, Sylvia Kratz, Judith Schick and Ewald Schnug
Institute
Julius Kühn-Institut, Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Institute for Crop and Soil Science, Braunschweig, Germany

Journal für Kulturpflanzen, 67 (2). S. 45–60, 2015, ISSN 1867-0911, DOI: 10.5073/JfK.2015.02.01, Verlag Eugen Ulmer KG, Stuttgart

Correspondence
Dr. Sylvia Kratz, Julius Kühn-Institut, Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Institute for Crop and Soil Science, Bundesallee 50, 38116 Braunschweig, Germany, E-Mail: sylvia.kratz@jki.bund.de
Accepted
27 October 2014

Abstract

175 soil samples from pot and field experiments with different types of organic (farmyard manure, meat and bone meal, bone meal) and mineral fertilization were used to evaluate the potential of a method to estimate relative shares of soluble organic P in water, CAL, Olsen and AR extracts/digest, based on the combination of two analytical methods (colorimetry and ICP-OES). The main aim of the study was to investigate if long-term fertilization with organic P sources is reflected by an increased share of extractable (or dissolved) organic P in the soil. The applied method worked well to estimate the relative share of organic P dissolved in water, CAL, Olsen and AR extracts. The estimated share of dissolved organic P decreased in the order P-CAL ≥ P-Olsen > P-water ≥ P-AR. However, long-term organic fertilization was not reflected in a higher share of soluble organic P than mineral fer­tilization. On the contrary, in some cases, organically fertilized plots displayed even higher shares of inorganic P (soluble in CAL) than minerally fertilized plots. Obviously, the received organic P was not enriched in the soluble organic substance of the soil, but was either transferred quickly into inorganic P forms by microbial soil processes stimulated by the large addition of organic matter from MBM/manure, or it was turned into stable organic P compounds which were not solubilized by the tested extractants. Neither the role of soil pH, nor that of organic carbon with regard to influencing relatives shares or organic P or, rather, the turnover of soluble organic into insoluble organic or into inorganic P in agricultural soils, could be clarified within this study and thus warrants further research.

Key words: Soluble organic phosphorus, soil P extraction methods, soil test P, manure, organic fertilization, mineral fertilization

Zusammenfassung

Anhand von 175 Bodenproben aus Gefäß- und Feldver­suchen mit unterschiedlichen Typen organischer (Wirtschaftsdünger, Fleischknochenmehl) und mineralischer Düngung wurde das Potential einer Methode zur Abschätzung relativer Anteile in Wasser, CAL, Olsenextrakt und Königswasser löslichen organischen Phosphors bewertet. Die Methode basiert auf der Kombination zweier analy­tischer Verfahren, namentlich Kolorimetrie und ICP-OES. Hauptziel der Studie war es zu untersuchen, ob die langfristige Düngung mit organischen P-Quellen sich in einem im Vergleich zu mineralischer Düngung erhöhten Anteil gelösten organischen Phosphors im Boden wider spiegelt. Die eingesetzte Methode eignete sich gut, relative Anteile an organischem P, das sich in Wasser, CAL, Olsenextrakt oder Königswasser löst, abzuschätzen. Die geschätzten Anteile an gelöstem organischen P nahmen in der Reihenfolge P-CAL ≥ P-Olsen > P-Wasser ≥ P-Königswasser ab. Langfristige organische Düngung spiegelte sich allerdings nicht in im Vergleich zu mineralischer Düngung erhöhten löslichen organischen P-Anteilen wider. Vielmehr zeigten in manchen Fällen (insbesondere CAL-Extrakt) die organisch gedüngten Flächen sogar höhere Anteile an anorganischem Phosphor als mineralisch gedüngte Vergleichsflächen. Offensichtlich wurde der eingebrachte organische Phosphor nicht in der löslichen organischen Substanz des Bodens akkumuliert, sondern entweder aufgrund der Stimulierung mikrobieller Prozesse durch die hohe Zufuhr organischer Substanz (aus Wirtschaftsdünger oder Fleischknochenmehl) zügig in anorganische P-Formen umgewandelt, oder er wurde in stabile orga­nische P-Verbindungen eingebaut, die sich in den eingesetzten chemischen Extraktionsmitteln nicht lösten. Weder die Rolle des Boden-pH, noch jene von organischem Kohlenstoff im Hinblick auf die Umsetzung löslicher organischer in anorganische oder unlösliche organische P-Verbindungen konnte im Zuge dieser Studie geklärt werden – dies bedarf weiterer Untersuchungen.

Stichwörter: Löslicher organischer Phosphor, Bodenextraktionsmethoden, extrahierbarer P, Wirtschaftsdünger, organische Düngung, mineralische Düngung

1 Introduction

Phosphorus (P) is a major nutrient which is essential for plants and animals and has been intensively investigated. P in soil exists in two basic forms: inorganic and organic (Tisdale and Nelson, 1975). Inorganic P includes apatitic minerals, secondary precipitates formed with Ca, Fe and Al and free phosphate ions. Organic P represents about 50% of total P in soils (Yadav and Verma, 2012; Condron et al., 2005: between 30 and 65% of total P; Richardson et al., 2005: between 30 and 80% of total P). Orthophosphate monoesters are considered the dominant form of organic P in most soils, among which inositol phosphate is the most abundant one, while phosphoproteins, mononucleotides, and sugar phosphates only occur in traces (Condron et al., 2005; Turner et al., 2002; Mahdi et al., 2011). Other organic P compounds in soils include orthophosphate diesters (nucleic acids, phospholipids, and teichoic acid), aromatic compounds, phosphonates and organic phosphate anhydrides, e.g. ATP and ADP (Condron et al., 2005). Geochemical and biological processes are controlling the P cycle and the availability of P in soils. These processes involve solubilization, precipitation, sorption, desorption, leaching, immobilization and mineralization (Soinne, 2009). Plants assimilate P in its inorganic form, i.e. as orthophosphate (HPO42–, H2PO4). However, there is wide agreement among researchers that organic P also significantly contributes to the nutrition of plants, once it has been mineralized by biochemical hydrolysis or by plant root exudates such as low molecular organic acids, extracellular as well as cell membrane-bound phosphatase enzymes, or protons to acidify the rhizosphere (Condron et al., 2005, Kovar and Claassen, 2005). While some authors claim that labile organic soil P, comprising compounds such as RNA, lecithin, glucose-6-phosphate (G-6-P), and glycerophosphate, is easily available to plants (Zhang et al., 1994, with further references), no evidence has been provided until now to indicate that dissolved organic P compounds may be directly taken up by plants, although organic P substrates may be hydrolyzed within the root apoplast (Richardson et al., 2005; George et al., 2011).

Farmyard manure is an important source of nutrients including P. P in manure can exist in organic or inorganic form; nevertheless, it is mostly present in an inorganic form (60–90%), with its actual composition depending on livestock type (Barnett, 1994; Leinweber, 1996). Organic P mainly exists in manure in form of inositol P, as well as some more labile compounds (Turner, 2004). Applying manure for a long time can change the extractability and solubility of soil P forms; a continuous addition will lead to an increase in soil pH as well as the input of relatively high amounts of Ca, resulting in a switch from Al- and Fe-P which are predominating in acidic soil to Ca-P reaction products (Sharpley et al., 2004). Continued application of farmyard manure can increase the amounts of organic P in the soil under certain circumstances (Ottabong et al., 1997; Zhang and MacKenzie, 1997, both as cited by Condron et al., 2005; Reddy et al., 2000). Important factors favoring the immobilization of P in the form of stable organic compounds are a high C/P ratio (> 300, e.g. due to large C returns to soils in crop residues, Zhang and MacKenzie, 1997) or a deficiency in available N (Ottabong et al., 1997). On the other hand, the long-term application of manure contributes to a reduction of P adsorption capacity, as organic matter may block active exchange sites and solubilize soil components active in P fixation (Lopez-Hernandez et al., 1979, as cited by McLaughlin, 1984). It may also stimulate the microbes and enzymes which increase the biological transition of organic P; as a consequence, available and soluble P levels may increase in both surface and subsurface soil horizons (Mozaffari and Sims, 1994).

Meat and bone meal (MBM) and bone meal (BM) are produced from animal parts which are not used for human consumption. Both contain a number of valuable plant nutrients including P. P in MBM exists in the form of Ca5(PO4)3OH in the bone fraction, while in the meat fraction it is present in organic form (Jeng et al., 2006). MBM and BM are P- and Ca-rich by-products of the poultry and livestock industries (Baker et al., 1989) and are considered an important source of P for soils that suffer from P-deficiency (Bekele and Höfner, 1993). However, the availability of P to plants from both, MBM and BM, is mainly controlled by soil pH. Investigations indicated that MBM and BM are more effective P fertilizers and lead to higher yields in acid soils than in soils with pH > 6 (Bekele and Höfner, 1993; Surendra et al., 1993; Jeng et al., 2006). Generally, a high share (about 80–90%) of MBM-P and BM-P is soluble in ammonium citrate (Rex, 2009), and only a small percentage is soluble in water (3 and 2%, respectively, see Ylivainio et al. (2008) and Rex (2009)). In other words, the amount of immediately available P is significantly less than the amount of P which will become available later during the vegetation period. While in digested mineral fertilizers, available P that is soluble in water and weak acid varies widely, it is mostly higher than in MBM/BM, e.g. 93% in super and triple superphosphate. In contrast to this, untreated rock phosphate (apatite) displays a lower solubility in weak acid than MBM/BM, ranging around 1–7% in ammonium citrate (Zapata and Roy, 2004).

Chemical measurements and soil tests have been developed to assess the concentration of plant-available P in soil. Thomas and Peaslee (1973) preferred to use the term “extractable” P instead of available P, because the extracted amount does not measure the available P quantitatively, but gives an indicator of the ability of soil to replenish the soil P required by plants (Black, 1993). As the properties of soils differ widely and due to the variety of P forms in the soil, different soil tests may be best suitable to reflect the amount of available P in a given soil. Extractants found throughout the world comprise a long list, including water, carbon dioxide saturated water, acids, bases, salts, buffered solutions, electro dialysis and ion exchangers (Indiati et al., 1997). However, even with strong extractants it is difficult to extract and quantify different pools of soil organic P, since a large part of it is strongly sorbed to mineral components. Furthermore, organic P compounds are often chemically modified by the extractants (Turner et al., 2005).

Extracted P can, among other methods, either be measured colorimetrically or by using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES). The colorimetric method is based on the reaction of PO4 and molybdate to form 12-molybdophosphoric acid in an acid solution and sequential reduction to a blue heteropoly compound, where the intensity of the blue corresponds with the concentration of P (Rieman and Beukenkamp, 1961). This method, which was developed by Murphy and Riley (1962), is considered the most widespread analytical method for the detection of inorganic phosphorus, because the coloring agent only reacts with the dissolved reactive phosphorus (the inorganic orthophosphate (PO4) compound), while the dissolved unreactive phosphorus (often interpreted as organic P) does not react with this agent (Soldat et al., 2009; Regan et al., 2010, as cited by Matula, 2010). On the other hand, inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) is used in most laboratories for soil testing because it is faster, its costs have decreased, and it can measure many chemical elements in the same extractant (e.g., P, K, Ca, Mg, and micronutrients). With this analysis method all P forms, organic and inorganic, can be measured (Mallarino, 2003; Ziadi et al., 2009; Matula, 2010, 2011; Paz-Ferreiro et al., 2012). Many studies demonstrated that ICP measures more P in the same extract than the colorimetric method does. P measured by ICP is sometimes up to 50% higher than P measured colorimetrically (Nathan and Sun, 1998; Elliason et al., 2001; Nathan et al., 2002; Mallarino, 2003; Pittman et al., 2005; Ziadi et al., 2009; Matula, 2010, 2011). Most of these studies agree that this additional amount is related to organic P (Nathan and Sun, 1998; Nathan et al., 2002; Ziadi et al., 2009; Matula, 2010; Paz-Ferreiro et al., 2012).

In a previous study (Shwiekh et al., 2014), we have confirmed that the amount of organic P extractable by soil P tests such as Olsen and water may be estimated by subtracting P measured colorimetrically (equals dissolved reactive or ortho-P) from P measured by ICP-OES (equals total dissolved P) in a lab experiment with pure chemicals. The aim of this study is now to evaluate the potential of this method to estimate organic P dissolved by four standard P extraction methods (CAL, Olsen, water and aqua regia (AR)) in soils fertilized with different organic P sources for a long time, and to investigate if long-term fertilization with organic P sources is reflected by an increased share of extractable (or dissolved) organic P in the soil.

2 Material and methods

2.1 Selection and description of soil samples

A total of 175 surface soil samples with varying chemical and physical characteristics, a soil pH ranging from 4.1 to 7.4, and total C ranging from 0.64 to 3.4% were involved in this study. They came from 3 different origins:

I- 78 Samples from a pot experiment investigating the performance of rendering by-products as P fertilizers, conducted by the Institute of Crop and Soil Science (JKI), Braunschweig, Germany in 2010 and 2011. 39 Pots were filled with 6 kg of soil (classified as Dystic Cambisol/Orthic Luvisol) which was collected in April 2010 and sieved to < 1 cm before filling it into the 10L-Mitscherlich-pots. Four kinds of fertilizers were used: Meat and bone meal (org-MBM), bone meal (BM), rock phosphate (RP) and monocalciumphosphate (MCP). The pots were arranged randomly with three replicates for each treatment. Additionally 3 pots were used as control with no P application (zero P). Two crops were used in this pot experiment: in the first year ryegrass (Lolium perenne L) and in the second year maize (Zea mays L). The chemical characteristics of the soil are summarized in Tab. 1. The fertilizer application rates are given in Tab. 2.

Table 1. Chemical parameters of the soil (group I) used for the pot experiment

Soil parameter

Unit

 

pH

 

5.23

N (Total)

%

0.05

PCAL

mg/kg

19.7

KCAL

mg/kg

81.5

Mg (Available)

mg/kg

32.0

C (Total)

%

1.04

Table 2. Type, P and N contents of fertilizers applied to the soils of group I

P source

Abbreviation

P content

N content

  

%

%

Meat bone meal

Org-MBM

5.4

8.5

Bone meal

BM

10

4.0

Rock phosphate

RP

12

Monocalciumphosphate

MCP

23

II- 20 soil samples from a long term field experiment in Braunschweig (Julius Kühn-Institute), Germany (10° 27’ E; 52° 18’ N), investigating the influence of fertilization with meat and bone meal on various soil microbiological parameters (experimental site “FV 10”). The soil type is a Cambisol with a loamy sand soil texture (< 6.5% clay; > 47% sand). The samples were collected within 5 years since 2008 (4 samples/year). The field was fertilized either with MBM or with calcium ammonium nitrate and triplesuperphosphate.

III- 77 samples were collected in 2011 from 4 different regions in Germany during a field sampling campaign within the framework of the EU project “Baltic Manure” (14 fields). These regions differ in the dominating soils and dominant parent material. The sampled fields were either fertilized with manure or with soluble mineral fertilizers. Hence, the soils vary significantly in their characteristics such as the total and available content of P, soil texture and pH. The properties of these soil samples are compiled in Tab. 3.

Table 3. Description of soil samples collected within the EU project “Baltic Manure” (group III)

Field

pH range

Type of fertilizer

Sampling depth (cm)

Soil type

Region

1

6.7–7.0

mineral (DAP)

10

Dithmarschen

3

6.8–7.0

cattle slurry

10

Dithmarschen

4

5.7–7.0

cattle slurry

10

Dithmarschen

7

6.8–7.0

solid cattle manure

10

Plön

8

5.7–7.0

solid cattle manure

10

Plön

9

5.5–6.4

pig slurry

10

Hanover

10

5.9–6.7

mineral (DAP)

10

sandy loam

Hanover

11

5.6–6.1

no fertilization since 1997

10

sandy loam

Hanover

12

5.9–6.5

mineral (PK)

10

loamy sand, sandy loam, clayey loam

Hanover

A

5.4–6.1

mineral

10

loamy sand, sandy loam, clayey loam

Rostock

F

4.9–5.4

solid cattle manure

10

loamy sand, sandy loam, clayey loam

Rostock

H

5.5–5.7

cattle slurry

10

sand, loamy sand, sandy loam

Rostock

I

5.6–7.0

dry chicken manure

30

sand, loamy sand, sandy loam

Rostock

2.2 Methods for P-extraction

The four applied soil P tests are:


I- Calcium acetate lactate method (CAL), according to Schüller (1969), P was extracted with 0.05 M Ca-acetate (Ca(C2H3O2)2) + 0.05 M Ca-lactate (Ca[CH3CH(OH)COO]2) + 0.03 M acetic acid (CH3COOH)

II- Sodium bicarbonate extraction method (Olsen) (Olsen et al., 1954), 100 ml of solution (0.5 M NaHCO3) buffered to pH 8.5 with 1 M NaOH/1 L water

III- Water extraction method (van der Paauw et al., 1971)

IV- So-called total P was determined in an aqua regia (AR) digest according to AbfKlärV (1992).: the solution was composed of 3:1 (v/v) HCl: HNO3. AR is considered as a digestion method, but for the easier way of expression it was included here when the term “extraction methods” is used.

2.3 Methods for P-analysis and estimation of relative share of extractable organic P in soils

Analysis of extracted P was performed colorimetrically by using the ascorbic acid – ammonium molybdate method based on Murphy and Riley (1962). The second analytical method used to measure the extracted P was inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry, using an icap 6000 ICP-OES instrument (Thermo Fisher). As outlined in Shwiekh et al. (2014), estimating extractable organic P in soil samples was done by combining the two forms of P analysis: P measured by ICP-OES (P-ICP) was considered as total dissolved P and P measured by colorimetry (P-Col.) was considered as dissolved inorganic P, hence the organic P was estimated by subtracting P-Col. from P-ICP and expressing estimated extractable organic P in % of total P extractable by the given soil P test.

2.4 Statistical analysis

Analyses of variance (ANOVA) were conducted using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences SPSS® version 17.0 and Microsoft Office EXCEL 2007. The risk of rejecting a true hypothesis was set at 5% (p < 0.05). Oneway ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc test were used to identify significant differences between results from the various extraction and analytical methods. Relationships between different extraction and analytical methods as well as the impact of soil characteristics on extracted organic and inorganic P were tested by calculating the Pearson correlation co­efficient, and quantified by regression analysis (applying SPSS as well).

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Differences in extraction strength between the four investigated methods

As could be expected, the amount of extractable P, measured either by ICP or colormetrically, decreased in the order: AR > CAL ≥ Olsen > water. However, the difference between CAL and Olsen was insignificant (Tab. 4a and 4b). The used extraction solutions are different in their properties and chemical nature; hence, the reaction with soil components and their ability to extract available P from the soil differ, which is the main reason of the variations between the results of these methods (see Neyroud and Lischer, 2003). The strong acidic reagent of AR (3:1, v/v, HCl to HNO3) is used for estimation of “so-called total” P in soils, since it extracts less than 100% of the true total P concentration (about 80% according to WEPAL, 2000). In contrast to this, the water reagent extracts only small amounts of P (mainly P in dissolved form) which apparently not even reflect all forms of labile P (Wünscher, 2013). In between these two are the Olsen and CAL extracts, which, in addition to water-soluble forms, comprise some forms of labile P that are not immediately soluble in water but are potentially available to the plant later during the growing season (Elrashidi, 2010).

Table 4. Descriptive statistics for extractable P measured colorimetrically (n = 175)

 

Minimum

Maximum

Mean

Median

mg/kg

CAL

11.2

276

73.5

65.6

Olsen

16.0

165

55.7

52.8

Water

2.3

43.1

14.9

13.9

AR

254

1003

535

521

Table 4. Descriptive statistics for extractable P measured by ICP (n = 175)

 

Minimum

Maximum

Mean

Median

mg/kg

CAL

16.0

285

85.2

72.4

Olsen

22.9

186

65.3

63.7

Water

2.1

46.1

16.3

15.3

AR

279

1030

579

564

The absolute amounts of extracted inorganic P (P-Col.) tended to be higher in CAL than in Olsen in all four groups (org-M, MBM, BM and min); however, no significant difference between these two methods was found for the minerally fertilized plots. Also, no difference between CAL and Olsen was found for the zero-P plots (Tab. 5).

Table 5. The amount of extractable P (mean) measured co­lorimetrically differentiated by fertilization type (including the zero P plots)

 

CAL

Olsen

Water

AR

mg/kg

Org-M

93.6

48.7

16.6

495

min

65.1

59.6

15.2

561

MBM

71.4

59.7

15.4

572

BM

80.4

59.1

10.3

557

zero

41.0

41.5

10.1

382

Some scientists argued about the low ability of Olsen to extract P from organically fertilized soils in comparison to acidic reagents and proved in their studies that the absolute amount of extractable P increased whenever the acidity of the reagent increased (Sims, 2000; Ige et al., 2006). This is explained by the fact that the low pH of the reagent will dissolve more phosphate associated with Ca (Pizzeghello et al., 2011). However, in this study, CAL and Olsen extracted almost the same amounts of P from mineral fertilizers. Some of the minerally fertilized plots had received RP as a fertilizer, which also contains poorly soluble Ca-P, so it was checked if the different chemistry of RP would be reflected in the P extractability of the respective samples, particularly with regard to the Olsen extract. Since for the minerally fertilized samples from groups II and III the exact fertilizer type was not known, only samples from group I (comprising RP and MCP in the category “mineral”) were included in this test (Tab. 6). However, there was still no significant difference in extractable P between CAL and Olsen, respectively, neither for the rock phosphates, nor for the highly soluble MCP, so obviously the Olsen extract was fully capable of dissolving the same amount of Ca-phosphate as the CAL extract. Hence, there must be another reason why Olsen performed worse than CAL in extracting available P from the two organic fertilizers and from BM.

Table 6. Absolute and relative amounts of extractable P (mean) measured colorimetrically, differentiated by fer­tilization type (“min” differentiated further into MCP and RP)

 

AR

CAL

 

Olsen

 

Water

mg/kg

mg/kg

%

 

mg/kg

%

 

mg/kg

%

Org-M (n = 45)

495

93.6

18.9

 

48.7

9.8

 

16.6

3.4

MBM (n = 27)

572

71.4

12.5

 

59.7

10.4

 

15.4

2.7

BM (n = 19)

557

80.4

14.4

 

59.1

10.6

 

10.3

1.8

MCP (n = 18)

530

96.5

18.3

 

96.9

18.3

 

18.3

3.5

RP (n = 18)

596

27.9

4.7

 

33.4

5.6

 

5.3

0.9

Nevertheless, this differentiation brings up some useful information: As could be expected, samples from “RP-plots” displayed the lowest solubilities in CAL, Olsen and water. This observation agrees with Jeng et al. (2006), who also report RP-fertilized plots to display lower P-solubilities than those fertilized with MBM. This can be explained by the fact that the Ca-P in MBM, as well as in BM and manure, is not completely derived from apatite, but also to a considerable amount from different chemical structures, which are obviously easier to break up than the very sparingly soluble apatite in RP (Bationo et al., 1991; Menon and Chien, 1995). MCP-fertilized plots, on the other hand, display the highest solubility in the Olsen-extract. Interestingly, however, their solubilities in water are on the same low level as those for the org-M-, MBM- and BM-plots.

Evaluation of these results must be done with care, however, since the plots are not homogeneous with regard to their soil properties such as soil pH and content of organic matter/organic carbon, which will have a considerable influence on the transformation of the various fertilizers and their different P-forms in the soils (see below). Thus, these observations can only describe visible trends.

3.2 Differences in quantification between the two analytical methods

As expected, the results of P-determinations by ICP exceeded those determined by colorimetry in all four extraction methods (Tab. 7).

Table 7. Summary statistics of PCAL, POlsen, PAR and Pwater (mg/kg) measured by ICP and colorimetry (n = 175)

 

Minimum

 

Maximum

 

Mean

 

Median

 

ICP

Col.

 

ICP

Col.

 

ICP

Col.

 

ICP

Col.

Pwater

2.1

2.3

 

46.1

43.1

 

16.3

14.9

 

15.3

13.9

PCAL

16.0

11.2

 

285

276

 

85.2

73.5

 

72.4

65.6

POlsen

22.9

16.0

 

186

165

 

65.3

55.7

 

63.7

52.8

PAR

279

254

 

1031

1003

 

579

535

 

564

521

Main reason for this difference is the fact that the colorimetric method basically measures inorganic P, i.e., orthophosphate ions, while ICP determines total dissolved P including organic and inorganic P (Matula, 2010). There is much evidence in the literature confirming this finding (Nathan and Sun, 1998; Elliason et al., 2001; Nathan et al., 2002; Mallarino, 2003; Pittman et al., 2005; Jacoby, 2005; Ziadi et al., 2009; Matula, 2010, 2011). A highly significant correlation was noticed between P-ICP and P-Col. for all extraction methods. Fig. 1 presents the regression plots of the two analytical methods showing high R2 values for all extractants, and the regression slopes display that ICP values were higher than colorimetric ones with about 3, 1, and 2% for CAL, Olsen, and water. In the case of AR, the regression slope is below 1, how­ever, from the large intercept on the y-axis it can be seen clearly that, at least within the range of values occurring here, ICP-derived values exceed those determined by colorimetry in this case as well.

Fig. 1. Relationship between P measured by ICP-OES and P measured colorimetrically in four extraction me­thods.

Fig. 1. Relationship between P measured by ICP-OES and P measured colorimetrically in four extraction me­thods.

For the two extraction methods Olsen and AR, the ratio of P-ICP/P-Col. was nonlinearly related to P-Col., i.e. the difference between ICP and colorimetry was proportionally larger where soils contained low amounts of extractable P (Fig. 2). These results matched with the reports by Mallarino (2003), Pittman et al. (2005) and Adesanwo et al. (2013). Both Mallarino (2003) and Pittman et al. (2005) doubted that this relation could be affected by variation in soil pH and organic C. According to Adesanwo et al. (2013), one explanation might be the difference in sensitivity of these two methods, with ICP being the more sensitive one, however, it is surprising then that this phenomenon was not observed in the case of CAL and water extraction.

Fig. 2. Relationship between P-Col. and the ratio between P-ICP and P-Col. for (A) CAL, (B) Olsen, (C) water, and (D) AR methods.

Fig. 2. Relationship between P-Col. and the ratio between P-ICP and P-Col. for (A) CAL, (B) Olsen, (C) water, and (D) AR methods.

The plot for CAL (Fig. 2A) shows clearly that there are two subsets of samples, so samples were divided into two groups according to the values of the ratio between P-ICP and P-Col., where the first group ranged from 0.60 to 1.25 and the second one between 1.26–1.70. Yet, as can be seen in Fig. 3, the same results were obtained; i.e. the difference between ICP and colorimetry was not larger where soils contained low amounts of extractable P.

Fig. 3. Relationship between P-Col. and the ratio of P-ICP and P-Col. in the CAL extract for two subsets of samples: A) ratio between 0.60–1.25 and B) ratio between 1.26–1.70.

Fig. 3. Relationship between P-Col. and the ratio of P-ICP and P-Col. in the CAL extract for two subsets of samples: A) ratio between 0.60–1.25 and B) ratio between 1.26–1.70.

3.3 Comparison of estimated share of dissolved organic P in 4 different soil extracts

Looking at all samples as one big group, the estimated share of dissolved organic P decreased in the order P-CAL ≥ P-Olsen > P-water ≥ P-AR with 18.6, 16.5, 9.8 and 8.4% of the total extractable (= dissolved) P respectively (Fig. 2). The one-way ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc test showed that that the estimates by P-AR and P-water were significantly lower than those by P-CAL and P-Olsen (Tab. 8, Fig. 4).

Table 8. Descriptive statistics for relative share of organic P (%) estimated by four extraction methods (n = 175). Different letters indicate significant dif­ferences at the p < 0.05 level

 

Minimum

Maximum

Mean

Median

 

mg/kg

CAL

0.5

37.8

18.5a

23.3

Olsen

1.1

47.8

16.5a

15.1

Water

0.1

35.0

9.8b

9.0

AR

0.5

23.7

8.4b

7.2

Fig. 4. Comparisons between the relative shares of orga­nic P estimated by four different extraction me­thods (n = 175). Different letters indicate significant differences between cases at the level p < 0.05.

Fig. 4. Comparisons between the relative shares of orga­nic P estimated by four different extraction me­thods (n = 175). Different letters indicate significant differences between cases at the level p < 0.05.

The low share of organic P estimated for the AR extract may be explained by the fact that the strong acid reagent obviously breaks up most of the organic P compounds into ortho-P, which will then be measured as inorganic P. The relatively low share of estimated organic P in the water extract indicates that water will only extract orthophosphate to a large extent, while it comprises – if at all – only a very small amount of dissolved organic P.

In the next step, the relative share of dissolved organic P in the four soil extractants was compared for different fertilization regimes. Although one may speculate that long-term organic fertilization (org-M, org-MBM) will be displayed by a higher share of organic P in the soil extracts than mineral fertilization, this was clearly not the case for the investigated samples (see Fig. 5). On the contrary, when extracted by CAL, organically fertilized plots displayed even higher shares of inorganic P than minerally fertilized plots (Fig. 5A). This, however, agrees well with the results of various researchers who reported that more inorganic than organic P was found in soil fertilized with manure for a long time in comparison to soils which had received mineral fertilizer: For example, Sharpley et al. (1984) found that there was an increase in the proportion of total P as inorganic P from 34 to 71% with larger manure applications. One reason for this can be seen in the fact
that in the first place, between 60–90% of P in manure is inorganic (Barnett, 1994; Leinweber, 1996; Sharpley and Moyer, 2000). In addition to this, the long-term application of manure promotes the activity of microbes and enzymes, thus inducing mineralization of organic P, which further increases the share of inorganic (and soluble) P (Mozaffari and Sims, 1994; Motavalli and Miles, 2002). Depending on the soil pH, chemical hydrolysis of organic P may also play a role in further reducing the organic traces of fertilization (see for example Baldwin, 1998 and Matula, 2010). Similar findings were reported by Adesanwo et al. (2013), who compared STP-analysis by colorimetry and ICP-OES in 30 manured and 30 non-manured soil samples, applying water, CaCl2- and Mehlich 3 extraction methods. They also speculated that chemical transformations of organic P in manured soils might have leveled out differences in organic P contents between manured and non-manured soils, thus accounting for the lack of any effect of manure history on differences between ICP-P and colorimetric P.

Fig. 5. Comparison between the estimated relative share of organic P, differentiated by fertilization regime, in A) CAL, B) Olsen, C) water and D) AR extract.

Fig. 5. Comparison between the estimated relative share of organic P, differentiated by fertilization regime, in A) CAL, B) Olsen, C) water and D) AR extract.

For the other three extraction methods, Olsen, water and AR, the estimated organic P decreased in the following order: org-M > min > org-MBM, however, with no significant differences between org-M and min for the Olsen extractant (Tab. 9). The low amount of estimated organic P in org-MBM plots could be the result of a transformation of MBM-P into a more soluble and thus plant-available form after 2 years of experiment, which is compa­rable to what Ylivainio et al. (2008) reported about their experiment, which was carried out in non-calcareous soils, i.e. under conditions similar to this study.

Table 9. Relative share of organic P (%) (mean) estimated by four extractants, differentiated by fertilization types. Different letters indicate significant diffe­rences in each fertilizer type at the p < 0.05 level

Type of fertilizer

BM

Min

Org-M

Org-
MBM

Zero

n

19

74

45

27

10

CAL

29.3a

19.4a

7.6d

23.5a

23.4a

Olsen

14.7b

16.0a

18.0a

13.3b

25.4a

Water

5.7c

8.4b

14.0b

8.2c

11.5c

AR

6.2c

7.4b

10.4c

6.5c

15.4b

Interestingly, a high estimated share of organic P (mean values) was found in the zero P plots, in the case of the Olsen extract these plots even showed the highest share of organic P compared with the other fertilization regimes (25.4% of total extracted P) (Tab. 9). One possible reason could be that mineralization of organic P in P deficient soils may be rather slow since nutrient defi­ciency will generally lead to a slow growth of roots which in turn decreases the availability of oxygen, one of the important factors that affect the mineralization: according to Harrison (1982), only 1% of organic P is mineralized per year in P deficient soils.

The one-way ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc test used to compare the shares of organic P estimated by the four extraction methods (CAL, Olsen, water and AR) showed no significant differences between water and AR for most fertilizer regimes, except for org-M and zero-P. Between CAL and Olsen, significant differences in the estimated share of organic P were found for minerally fertilized plots and for zero-P (Tab. 9, Fig. 5A–D).

3.4 Effect of soil test P (= STP) class on relative share of dissolved organic P

In the last step it was tested whether the STP category (i.e. the level of P supply) had an influence on the estimated relative share of organic P in the extracts. Soil test P in Germany is classified into 5 categories A-E (Tab. 10).

Table 10. VDLUFA reference values for the soil test P clas­ses A to E, applicable for DL and CAL extracts (Kerschberger et al., 1997)

P-class

mg P/100 g soil

mg P2O5/100 g soil

A

≤ 2.0

≤ 5.0

B

2.1–4.4

6–9

C

4.5–9.0

10–20

D

9.1–15.0

21–34

E

≥ 15.1

≥ 35

In Tab. 11 the number of soil samples falling into each of the STP classes, differentiated by fertilization regime is shown.

Table 11. Number of soil samples per soil test P class, diffe­rentiated by fertilization regime

Fertilization regime

Soil test P class

 

A

B

C

D

E

sum

Zero

6

0

3

1

0

10

Min

3

26

31

10

4

74

BM

0

2

12

5

0

19

Org-MBM

0

6

14

7

0

27

Org-M

6

9

12

8

10

45

Sum

15

43

72

31

14

175

If the initial speculation about long-term organic fer­tilization leaving traces in the form of higher shares of extractable organic P had fallen true, this should have shown most clearly in the plots that had received large amounts of organic fertilizers (some of them over a long period of time), i.e. classes D and E of org-MBM or org-M. However, the results displayed the opposite in all four extracts: The average estimated share of organic P in samples fertilized with org-M (for example) in class E was 2.4, 7.9, 9.6 and 8.4% of total extracted P by CAL, Olsen water and AR extracts, respectively. In class A, these averages were 18.1, 39.2, 24.2 and 16.7% (Fig. 6). Comparable relations were found for org-MBM (Fig. 6). Obviously, the received organic P in class E (and D) was not enriched in the soluble organic substance of the soil, but was either transferred quickly into inorganic P forms by microbial soil processes stimulated by the large addition of organic matter from MBM/manure (see Mondini et al., 2008), or it was turned into stable organic P compounds which were not solubilized by the tested extractants. Several researchers recorded a reduction in the amount of organic P in soil even after long application of manure, as mentioned before. Yet, no similar observation has been reported for MBM, since long-term experiments dealing with MBM have been rare, as Bøen and Haraldsen (2013) stated, probably because the restrictions on using MBM as a fertilizer in EU countries were only lifted since 2006.

Fig. 6. Comparison between the relative share of organic P estimated for different fertilization types for CAL, Olsen, water and AR extracts, differentiated by STP class. Different letters indicate significant differen­ces between cases (within one STP class) at the level p < 0.05. In class D, zero plots were not included into the ANOVA because n = 1; in class E, a t-test between min and org-M was performed.

Fig. 6. Comparison between the relative share of organic P estimated for different fertilization types for CAL, Olsen, water and AR extracts, differentiated by STP class. Different letters indicate significant differen­ces between cases (within one STP class) at the level p < 0.05. In class D, zero plots were not included into the ANOVA because n = 1; in class E, a t-test between min and org-M was performed.

However, the larger difference between P-ICP and P-Col. in class A may at least in parts be a result of reasons not related to organic P but rather to other factors such as the differences in the sensitivity of these two methods, which are most clearly observed when soil test P is low (see above, chapter 3.2).

In comparison to those plots fertilized with mineral fertilizers (min), the manured plots (org-M) generally did not reveal a higher estimated share of organic P in the four extractants in class A (lowest P supply), confirming that the soluble organic P coming in with the manure transferred quickly into inorganic P by hydrolysis and other processes.

For class E (highest P supply), the estimated share of organic P was significantly higher in the minerally fer­tilized plots than in the ones fertilized with org-M only in CAL and Olsen, while in water and AR there was a sig­nificantly higher share of organic P in the plots fertilized with org-M (Fig. 6). Maybe this could be explained by the fact that at high organic P loads, organic P is no longer hydrolyzed completely, but some of it remains as dissolved organic P (water-soluble) or stable organic P (which can only be digested by AR). The reason why not everything is hydrolyzed in this case may be the increase in soil pH coming along with high amounts of organic fertilizer (manure).

3.5 Influence of soil pH on relative share of dissolved organic P

Soil pH is one of the most important factors which may influence the amount of extractable P. As mentioned above, it may have an influence on the strength of hydrolysis, or rather, on the time it takes to hydrolyze organic P into inorganic P. The soil pH values for the 175 samples of this study ranged from 4.1 to 7.4. Looking at all fertilization regimes in total, a strong and significant negative correlation was observed between soil pH and relative share of organic P estimated by the CAL extract (r = –0.83**), and a significant moderate correlation for the water extraction (r = 0.36**). No such correlation was found for the Olsen extract or the AR digest (Fig. 7).

Fig. 7. Scatterplot and coefficient of determination for the relationship between soil pH and relative share of or­ganic P estimated by four extraction methods.

Fig. 7. Scatterplot and coefficient of determination for the relationship between soil pH and relative share of or­ganic P estimated by four extraction methods.

The correlation between soil-pH and estimated share of organic P was also checked for each fertilizer regime separately (Tab. 12).

Table 12. Pearson correlation coefficients between the relati­ve share of organic P, estimated by four extraction methods, and soil pH, differentiated by type of fer­tilizer (n = 175)

 

BM

Min

Org-M

Org-MBM

zero

CAL

–0.823**

–0.793**

–0.566**

–0.881**

–0.933**

Olsen

–0.207

0.050

–0.574**

–0.637**

–0.403

Water

–0.331

0.500**

–0.634**

–0.673**

0.859*

AR

–0.440

0.075

–0.362

–0.756**

0.825**

For the CAL extract, negative and linear correlations existed between soil pH and the relative share of organic P in all five fertilizer regimes, however, the strength of this relationship was different, with the strongest correlation found for zero P fertilization (r = –0.93**) followed by org-MBM, BM and min with moderate correlations, while the weakest correlation was found for org-M (r = –0.57). For the Olsen extract there were negative and moderate correlations only for organically fertilized soils, i.e. the variants org-MBM and org-M (r = –0.64**, –0.57** respectively). A similar relationship was found in the investigations by Turner et al. (2003) and Turner and Haygarth (2003): The latter study, which was done for a range of UK pasture soils, confirmed that the concentration of organic P estimated by bicarbonate extractant was controlled by soil pH and this concentration increased when soil pH < 5. Similar correlations were reported by Mallarino (2003), Pittman et al. (2005) and Adesanwo et al. (2013). A negative relationship between estimated share of organic P (which is based on the difference in ICP-P and P-col.) on the one hand and soil pH on the other hand indicates that the estimate increases as soil pH decreases. As pointed out by Adesanwo et al. (2013) (see also: Eckert and Watson (1996), Elliason et al. (2001)), the exact role that pH plays in this respect is so far not clear. The authors speculate that some indirect influence of other parameters (such as the presence of suspended soil particles in the extract) which were not measured here might have an influence.

3.6 Effect of total C % in soil on the relative share of organic P

Usually, the amount of organic P in the soil increases with the Corg-concentration, the C/P-ratio can vary between 100 and 1000 (Blume et al., 2010). Reddy et al. (2000) report a significant increase of Corg with the organic P content in a soil due to the application of manure or manure and mineral P, which indicates that there might be a relation between the amount of organic P and organic carbon in the soil, thus a relation between the amount of organic P and total carbon in the soil, as the organic carbon is derived from subtracting inorganic carbon from total carbon (Verardo et al., 1990).

However, this was not confirmed by the results of this study. While Corg was not determined here, correlation tests for Ctotal and estimated share of organic P should give a first indication. When looking at all samples as one group, no visible relationship between the amount of Ctotal and on the amount of estimated relative share of organic P was observed. A very weak but still significant trend towards a positive effect of total C on the estimated relative share of organic P was observed in Olsen, water and AR extracts (r = 0.22***, 0.21** and 0.23** respectively). In contrast, there was a very weak negative effect for CAL, which was, however, not significant (r = –0.08) (Fig. 8).

Fig. 8. Scatterplots for the relationship between C% and relative share of organic P estimated by four extraction methods, looking at all samples as one group (n = 175).

Fig. 8. Scatterplots for the relationship between C% and relative share of organic P estimated by four extraction methods, looking at all samples as one group (n = 175).

The correlation between total C and the estimated share of organic P was also examined for each fertilizer regime separately in order to check whether a relationship would be visible for the organically fertilized plots at least (Tab. 13).

Table 13. Pearson correlation coefficients between the relati­ve share of organic P estimated by four extraction methods and total C % in the soil, differentiated by type of fertilizer (n = 175)

 

BM

Min

Org-M

Org-MBM

zero

CAL

–0.036

–0.133

–0.036

0.958**

–0.658*

Olsen

0.168

0.069

0.193

0.597**

–0.163

Water

–0.108

0.036

0.019

0.708**

0.568

AR

0.369

–0.029

0.030

0.435*

0.680*

Only the org-MBM plots showed significant positive correlations of moderate to high strength between the total C and estimated organic P for all extraction methods, while no significant correlations were found for the manured plots (org-M). Significant and moderately strong correlations were also found for the zero plots, with regard to the estimates from CAL and AR extracts, however, in the case of CAL, the relationship was negative.

Summary and Conclusions

The combination of two analytical methods, colorimetry and ICP-OES, worked well to estimate the relative share of organic P dissolved in water, CAL, Olsen and AR extracts when applied to a set of samples from pot and field experiments comparing various forms of organic and mineral fertilization regimes. Looking at all samples as one big group, the estimated share of dissolved organic P decreased in the order P-CAL ≥ P-Olsen > P-water ≥ P-AR. The low share of organic P estimated for the AR extract may be explained by the fact that the strong acid reagent obviously breaks up most of the organic P compounds into ortho-P, which will then be measured as inorganic P. The relatively low share of estimated organic P in the water extract indicates that water will only extract orthophosphate to a large extent, while it comprises – if at all – only a very small amount of dissolved organic P.

However, as the presented results demonstrated, long-term organic fertilization is not necessarily reflected in a higher share of soluble organic P than mineral fertilization. On the contrary, when extracted by CAL, organi­cally fertilized plots displayed even higher shares of inorganic P than minerally fertilized plots. This agrees well with reports of other researchers in the literature. One reason for this can be seen in the fact that between 60–90% of P in manure is inorganic in the first place. In addition, long-term application of manure promotes the activity of microbes and enzymes, thus inducing mineralization of organic P, which further increases the share of inorganic (and soluble) P. Depending on the soil pH, chemical hydrolysis of organic P may also play a role in further reducing the organic traces of fertilization. Furthermore, chemical transformations of organic P in manured soils might level out differences in organic P between manured and non-manured soils, thus accounting for the lack of any effect of manure history on differences between ICP-P and colorimetric P.

A comparably high estimated share of organic P was found in the zero P plots. This was probably due to a rather slow mineralization of organic P in P deficient soils associated with nutrient deficiency, which generally leads to a slow growth of roots, thus decreasing the availability of oxygen, which is an important factor affecting mineralization rates.

If the initial speculation about long-term organic fer­tilization leaving traces in the form of higher shares of extractable organic P had fallen true, this should have shown most clearly in the plots that had received large amounts of organic fertilizers, thus ranging in classes D and E. However, the results displayed the opposite in all four extracts. Obviously, the received organic P in class E (and D) was not enriched in the soluble organic substance of the soil, but was either transferred quickly into inorganic P forms by microbial soil processes stimulated by the large addition of organic matter from MBM/manure, or it was turned into stable organic P compounds which were not solubilized by the tested extractants. For class E, the estimated share of organic P was significantly higher in the minerally fertilized plots than in the ones fertilized with org-M only in CAL and Olsen, while in water and AR there was a significantly higher share of organic P in the plots fertilized with org-M. Maybe this could be explained by the fact that at high organic P loads, organic P is no longer hydrolyzed completely, but some of it remains as dissolved organic P (water-soluble) or stable organic P (which can only be digested by AR). The reason why not everything is hydrolyzed in this case may be the increase in soil pH coming along with high amounts of organic fertilizer (manure).

Inconsistent results were recorded when the influence of soil pH on the estimated share of organic P was tested. As already pointed out by other researchers, the exact role that pH plays in this respect is still unclear and needs further investigation. Some authors speculate that some indirect influence of other parameters (such as the presence of suspended soil particles in the extract) which were not measured here might have an influence. Similarly, the role of organic carbon with regard to relative shares of soluble organic P could not be clarified in our study and warrants further research.

References

AbfKlärV, 1992: Klärschlammverordnung vom 15. April 1992 (BGBl. I S. 912), zuletzt geändert durch Artikel 5 Absatz 12 des Gesetzes vom 24. Februar 2012 (BGBl. I S. 212).

Adesanwo, O.O., D.V. Ige, L. Thibault, D. Flaten, W. Akinremi, 2013: Comparison of colorimetric and ICP methods of phosphorus determination in soil extracts. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 44, 3061-3075.

Baker, A.M., J.R. Trimm, F.R. Sikora, 1989: Availability of phosphorus in bone meal. Journal Association of Official Analytical Chemists 72, 867-869.

Barber, S.A., 1995: Soil nutrient bioavailability: A mechanism approach. New York, John Wiley and Sons.

Bekele, T., W. Höfner, 1993: Effect of different phosphate fertilizers on yield of barley and rape seed on reddish brown soils of the Ethiopian highlands. Fertilizer Research 34, 243-250.

Baldwin, D.S., 1998: Reactive ‘organic’ phosphorus revisited. Water Research 32, 2265-2270.

Barnett, G.M., 1994: Manure P fractionation. Bioresour Technology 19, 149-155.

Bationo, A., W.E. Baethgen, C.B. Christianson, A.U. Mokwunye, 1991: Comparison of five soil testing methods to establish phosphorus sufficiency levels in soil fertilized with water-soluble and sparingly soluble-P sources. Fertilizer Research 28, 271-279.

Black, C.A., 1993: Soil fertility evaluation and control. Boca Raton, FL, Lewis Publ.

Blume, H.P., G.W. Brümmer, R. Horn, E. Kandeler, I. Kögel-Knabner, R. Kretzschmar, K. Stahr, B.M. Wilke, S. Thiele-Bruhn, G. Welp, 2010: Scheffer/Schachtschabel. – Lehrbuch derBodenkunde. (16. Aufl.) Heidelberg, Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, 569 S.

Bøen, A., T.K. Haraldsen, 2013: Meat and bone meal and biosolids as slow release phosphorus fertilizers. Agricultural and Food Science 22, 235-246.

Eghball, B., 2002: Soil properties as influenced by phosphorus- and nitrogen-based manure and compost applications. Agronomy Journal 94, 128-135.

Condron, L.M., B.L. Turner, B.J. Cade-Menun, 2005: Chemistry and dynamics of soil organic phosphorus. In: Sims J T and Sharpley A N (eds.) Phosphorus: Agriculture and Environment. Agronomy 46. Chapter 4, 87-121.

Eckert, D.J., M.E. Watson, 1996: Integrating the Mehlich-3 extractant into existing soil test interpretation schemes. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 27, 1237-1249.

Elliason, R., J.L. Lamb, G.W. Rehm, 2001: Colorimetric and ICP measurement of P extracted by the Mehlich III procedure. Agronomy Abstracts CD-ROM, Madison, WI, American Society of Agronomy- Crop Science Society of America- Soil Science Society of America.

Elrashidi, M.A., 2010: Selection of an appropriate phosphorus test for soils, Soil survey laboratory. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, Lincoln (NE). [online: ftp://ftp-fc.egov.usda.gov/NSSC/Analytical soils phosphor.pdf].

Eriksson, A.K., 2009: Phosphorus in agricultural soils around the Baltic Sea – Comparisons of different laboratory methods as indices for phosphorus leaching to waters. Seminarier och examens­arbeiten Nr. 64. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences – Division of Water Quality management, Uppsala. [online: http://stud.epsilon.slu.se/826/1/eriksson_a_k_100209.pdf].

George, T.S., A.M. Fransson, J.P. Hammond, P.J. White, 2011: Phosphorus nutrition: rhizosphere processes, plant response and adaptations. In: Bünemann, E.K., A. Oberson, E. Frossard (eds.), Phosphorus in Action. Biological Processes in Soil Phosphorus Cycling. Berlin Heidelberg, Springer, Chapter 10, 245-271.

Hartwich, H., R. Baritz, M. Fuchs, D. Kurg, S. Richter, 2010: Erläute­rungen zur Bodenregionenkarte der Europäischen Union und ihrer Nachbarstaaten im Maßstab 1:5.000.000. Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften (Ed.).

Ige, D.V., O.O. Akinremi, D. Flaten, M.A. Kashem, 2006: Comparison of soil test phosphorus methods in neutral to calcareous Manitoba soils. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 86, 691-699.

Indiati, R., C. Izza, E. Coppola, A. Figliolia, B. Felici, C. Buondonno, A. Buondonno, 1997: Comparing tests for soil fertility. III. Evaluation of phosphate availability in Alfisols by Olsen, Mehlich 3, electro-ultrafiltration, and the paper-strip methodology procedures. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 28 (11 and 12), 997-1009.

Ivanov, K., P. Zaprjanova, M. Petkova, V. Stefanova, V. Kmetov, D. Georgieva, V. Angelova, 2012: Comparison of inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry and colorimetric determination of total and extractable phosphorus in soils. Spectrochimica Acta Part B 71-72, 117-122.

Jacoby, F.J., 2005: Extractable soil phosphorus, correlation with P forms in soil runoff, and relationships with the Texas P Index as a nutrient management tool for CAFOs. Ph.D. diss. Texas A and M University, College Station.

Jeng, A., T.K. Haraldsen, A. Grønlund, P.A. Pedersen, 2006: Meat and bone meal as nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer to cereals and rye grass. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 76, 183-191.

Kerschberger, M., U. Hege, A. Jungk, 1997: VDLUFA-Standpunkt „Phosphordüngung nach Bodenuntersuchung und Pflanzenbedarf“, Darmstadt, Eigenverlag.

Leinweber, P., 1996: Phosphorus fractions in soils from an area with high density of livestock population. Z. Pflanzenernaehr. Bodenkd. 159, 251-256.

Lopez-Hernandez, D., D. Flores, G. Siegert, J.V. Rodriguez, 1979: The effect of some organic anions on phosphate removal from acid and calcareous soils. Soil Science 128, 321-326.

Mahdi, S.S., G.I. Hassan, A. Hussain, F. Rasool, 2011: Phosphorus Availability Issue- Its Fixation and Role of Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria in Phosphate Solubilization. Research Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2 (1), 174-179.

Mallarino, A.P., 2003: Field calibration for corn of the Mehlich-3 soil phosphorus test with colorimetric and inductively coupled plasma emission spectroscopy determination methods. Soil Science Society of America Journal 67, 1928-1934.

Matula, J., 2010: Differences in available phosphorus evaluated by soil tests in relation to detection by colorimetric and ICP-AES techniques. Plant, Soil and Environment 56 (6), 297-304.

Matula, J., 2011: Determination of dissolved reactive and dissolved total phosphorus in water extract of soils. Plant, Soil and Environment 57 (1), 1-6.

Menon, R.G., S.H. Chien, 1995: Soil testing for available phosphorus in soils where phosphate rock-based fertilizers are used. Fertilizer Research 41, 179-187.

McLaughlin, M.J., 1984: Land application of sewage sludge: Phosphorus considerations. A review. South African Journal of Plant and Soil 1, 21-29.

Mondini, C., M.L. Cayuela, T. Sinicco, E. Bertolone, L. Bardi, 2008: Soil application of meat and bone meal. Short-term effects on mineralization dynamics and soil biochemical and microbiological properties. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 40, 462-474.

Motavalli, P.P., R.J. Miles, 2002: Soil phosphorus fractions after 111 years of animal manure and fertilizer applications. Biology and Fertility of Soils 36, 35-42. DOI 10.1007/s00374-002-0500-6.

Mozaffari, M., J.T. Sims, 1994: Phosphorus availability and sorption in an Atlantic coastal plain watershed dominated by animal based agriculture. Soil Science 157, 97-107.

Murphy, J., J.P. Riley, 1962: A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Analytical Chemistry Acta 27, 31-36.

Nathan, M.V., Y. Sun, 1998: Comparison of Mehlich III Extract able Nutrients using ICP, AA, and colorimetry for manured and unmanured soils. p. 251. Agronomy Abstracts. Madison, WI, American Society of Agronomy- Crop Science Society of America- Soil Science Society of America.

Nathan, M.V., A. Mallarino, R. Elliason, R. Miller, 2002: ICP vs. colorimetric determination of Mehlich III extractable phosphorus. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 33, 2432.

Nelson, W.L., A. Mehlich, E. Winters, 1953: The development, evaluation and use of soil tests for phosphorus availability. In: Pieere, W.H., A.G. Norman (ed.), Soil and fertilizer phosphorus. Agronomy 4, 153-158. Madison, WI, Am. Society of Agronomy.

Neyroud, J.A., P. Lischer, 2003: Do different methods used to estimate soil phosphorus availability across Europe give comparable results? Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 166, 422-431.

Olsen, S.R., C.V. Cole, F.S. Watanabe, L.A. Dean, 1954: Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. Washington DC, US Department of Agriculture Circular 939, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, Kamprath and Watson, 1976.

Ottabong, E., J. Persson, O. Iakimenko, L. Sadovnikova, 1997: The Ultuna long-term soil organic matter experiment. 2. Phosphorus status and distribution in soils. Plant Soil 195, 17-23.

Paz-Ferreiro, J., E. Vidal Vázquez, C. Aparecida de Abreu, 2012: Phosphorus determination after Mehlich 3 extraction and anion exchange resin in an agricultural soil of northwestern Spain. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 43 (1-2), 102-111.

Pittman, J.J., H. Zhang, J.L. Schroder, M.E. Payton, 2005: Differences of phosphorus in Mehlich 3 extracts determined by colorimetric and spectroscopic methods. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 36, 1641-1659.

Pizzeghello, D., A. Berti, S. Nardi, F. Morari, 2011: Phosphorus forms and P-sorption properties in three alkaline soils after long-term mineral and manure applications in north-eastern Italy. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 141, 58-66.

Reddy, D.D., A. Subba Rao, T.R. Rupa, 2000: Effects of continuous use of cattle manure and fertilizer phosphorus on crop yields and soil organic phosphorus in a Vertisol. Bioresource Technology 75, 113-118.

Regan, J.T., M. Rodgers, M.G. Healy, L. Kirwan, O. Fenton, 2010: Determining phosphorus and sediment release rates from five Irish tillage soils. Journal of Environmental Quality 39, 185-192.

Rex, M., 2009: Thermic digestion of animal meal ash in converter slag. [online: http://www.jki.bund.de/fileadmin/dam uploads/koordinierend/bs naerhrstofftage/baltic21/28 Rex.pdf].

Richardson, A.E., T.S. George, M. Hens, R.J. Simpson, 2005: Utilization of soil organic phosphorus by higher plants. In: Turner, B.L., E. Frossard (eds.), Organic Phosphorus in the Environment. Chapter 8, 165-184.

Rieman, W., J. Beukenkamp, 1961: “Treatise on Analytical Chemistry,” I. M. Kolthoff and P. J. Elving, Eds., Part 11, Vol. 5, New York, Wiley, 317-402.

Schüller, H., 1969: Die CAL-Methode, eine neue Methode zur Bestimmung des pflanzenverfügbaren Phosphates im Böden. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenernährung und Bodenkunde 123(1), 48-63.

Sharpley, A.N., S.J. Smith, B.A. Stewart, A.C. Mathers, 1984: Forms of Phosphorus in Soil Receiving Cattle Feedlot Waste. Journal of Environmental Quality 13 (2), 211-215.

Sharpley, A.N., 1985: Phosphorus cycling in unfertilized and fer­tilized agricultural soils. American Society of Agronomy- Crop Science Society of America- Soil Science Society of America 49, 905-911.

Sharpley, A.N., B. Moyer, 2000: Phosphorus forms in manure and compost and their release during simulated rainfall. Journal of Environmental Quality 29, 1462-1469.

Sharpley, A.N., R.W. McDowell, P.J.A. Kleinman, 2004: Amounts, Forms, and Solubility of Phosphorus in Soils Receiving Manure. American Society of Agronomy- Crop Science Society of America- Soil Science Society of America 68, 2048-2057.

Shwiekh, R., S. Kratz, J. Schick, H. Kammerer, S. Sayed Ahmed, E. Schnug, 2014: Determination of inorganic and organic P dissolved in water and Olsen extracts by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) and colorimetry. Landbauforschung,-Appl Agric Forestry Res. 4 (63) 303-306.

Sims, J.T., 2000: Soil Test Phosphorus: Olsen P. In: Pierzynski, G.M. (Ed.), Methods of Phosphorus Analysis for Soils, Sediments, Residuals, and Waters. Pp. 20-21. Manhattan: Kansas State University, [online: http://www.sera17.ext.vt.edu/Documents/Methods_of_P_Analysis_2000.pdf].

Soinne, H., 2009: Extraction methods in soil phosphorus characterisation- Limitations and applications. Academic dissertation. Department of Applied Chemistry and Microbiology, University of Helsinki. ISBN 978-952-10-5878-3.

Soldat, D.J., A.M. Petrovic, Q.M. Ketterings, 2009: Effect of soil phosphorus levels on phosphorus runoff concentrations from turfgrass. Water, Air and Soil Pollution 99, 33-34.

Surendra, S., K.P. Singh, A.K. Sarkar, B.P. Singh, B.P. Gupta, 1993: Release pattern of phosphorus from indigenous phosphatic sources on acid soil. The Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science 41, 774-775.

Thomas, G.W., D.E. Peaslee, 1973: Testing soils for phosphorus. In: Walsh, L.M., J.D. Beaton (eds.), Soil testing and plant analysis. Revised edition, Madison, WI, Soil Science Society of America.

Tisdale, S.L., W.L. Nelson, 1975: Soil Fertility and Fertilizers (3rd ed.). Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc. New York, 694p, ISBN 0-02-420860-4.

Turner, B.L., M. Papházy, P.M. Haygarth, I.D. McKelvie, 2002: Inositol phosphates in the environment. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London, Series B 357, 449-469.

Turner, B.L., N. Mahieu, L.M. Condron, 2003: Phosphorus-31 nuclear magnetic resonance spectral assignments of phosphorus compounds in soil NaOH-EDTA extracts. Soil Science Society of America Journal 67, 497-510.

Turner, B.L., P.M. Haygarth, 2003: Changes in bicarbonate- extractable inorganic and organic phosphorus following soil drying. Soil Science Society of America Journal 67, 344-350.

Turner, B.L., 2004: Optimizing phosphorus characterization in animal manures by solution phosphorus- 31 nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Journal of Environmental Quality 33, 757-766.

Turner, B.L., B.J. Cade-Menun, L.M. Condron, S. Newman, 2005: Extraction of soil organic phosphorus. Talanta 66, 294-306.

van der Paauw, F., H.A. Sissingh, J. Ris, 1971: Een verbeterede methode van fosfaatextractie van grond met water: het Pw-getal; with a summary: An improved method of water extraction for the assessment of availability of soil phosphate: PW value. Verslagen van landbouwkundige onderzoekingen, Vol. 749.

Verardo, D.G., P.N. Froelich, A. McIntyre, 1990: Determination of organic carbon and nitrogen in marine sediments using the carlo erba NA-1500 analyzer. Deep Sea Research Vol. 37, No. 1, 157-165.

WEPAL, 2000: Quarterly report 2000-2. Wageningen: university Department Environmental Science.

Wünscher, R., 2013: A Comparison of Different Phosphorus Extraction Methods with the Phosphorus Uptake of Wheat. Master thesis, Universität für Bodenkultur Wien, Department für Wald- und Bodenwissenschaften.

Yadav, B.K., A. Verma, 2012:. Phosphate Solubilization and Mobilization in Soil Through Microorganisms Under Arid Ecosystems, The Functioning of Ecosystems. Maharane A. (Ed.), ISBN: 978-953-51-0573-2, InTech, Available from: [online: http://www.intechopen.com/books/the-functioning-ofecosystems/phosphate-solubilization-and-mobilization-in-soil-through-microorganisms-under-arid ecosystems].

Ylivainio, K., R. Uusitalo, E. Turtola, 2008: Meat bone meal and fox manure as P sources for ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) grown on a limed soil. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 81, 267-278.

Zapata, F., R.N. Roy, 2004: Use of phosphate rocks for sustainable agriculture. A joint publication of FAO Land and Water Department Division and the International Atomic Energy Agency. ISBN 92-5-105030-9.

Zhang, T.Q., A.F. MacKenzie, 1997: Changes in soil phosphorus fractions under long-term corn monoculture. Soil Science Society of America Journal 61, 485-493.

Zhang, Y.S., W. Werner, H.W. Scherer, X. Sun, 1994: Effect of organic manure on organic phosphorus fractions in two paddy soils. Biology and Fertility of Soils 17, 64-68.

Ziadi, N., G. Bélanger, B. Gagnon, D. Mongrain, 2009: Mehlich 3 soil phosphorus as determined by colorimetry and inductively coupled plasma. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 40 (1-6), 132-140.


ISSN (elektronisch): 1867-0938
ISSN (print): 1867-0911
Verlag
Eugen Ulmer KG
Ulmer-Logo
Verantwortlicher Herausgeber
Präsident und Professor
Prof. Dr. Frank Ordon
Julius Kühn-Institut - Bundesforschungsinstitut für Kulturpflanzen
Erwin-Baur-Str. 27
06484 Quedlinburg
Schriftleitung
Dr. Anja Hühnlein
Julius Kühn-Institut - Bundesforschungsinstitut für Kulturpflanzen
Erwin-Baur-Str. 27
06484 Quedlinburg
E-Mail: journal-kulturpflanzen@julius-kuehn.de
Co-Schriftleitung
Dr. Ulrike Stahl
Julius Kühn-Institut - Bundesforschungsinstitut für Kulturpflanzen
Layout/Technische Umsetzung
mediaTEXT Jena GmbH
mediaTEXT-Logo
Julius Kühn-Institut (JKI)
Bundesforschungsinstitut für Kulturpflanzen
 
Erwin-Baur-Str. 27
06484 Quedlinburg
Deutschland
Fon: 03946 47-0
Fax: 03946 47-255
Mail: poststelle@julius-kuehn.de
De-Mail: poststelle@julius-kuehn.de-mail.de
Impressum
 
Diese Zeitschrift wird vom Julius Kühn-Institut herausgegeben.
JKI-Logo