Genetic diversity and virulence variability in Diplodia mutila isolates from symptomatic grapevines in New Zealand
Virulence and genetic diversity of Diplodia mutila
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5073/vitis.2023.62.85-96Keywords:
anastomosis, Botryosphaeria stevensii, Botryosphaeriaceae, Diplodia mutila, pathogenicity, vegetative compatibility group, Vitis viniferaAbstract
Genetic diversity and virulence variability of Diplodia mutila isolates recovered from grapevines in New Zealand were investigated. The universally primed PCR (UP-PCR) and vegetative compatibility group (VCG) methods were used to investigate the genetic diversity. Pathogenicity tests with ‘Sauvignon Blanc’ detached shoots and potted vines were used to determine the virulence diversity. UP-PCR analysis determined eight genetic groups of D. mutila with 70% of the population within one group. Phylogenetic analysis also determined that New Zealand isolates were more closely related to Australian isolates than Californian isolates. Vegetative compatibility grouping analysis placed the isolates into three VCG groups, with 57% of isolates belonging to all three VCGs. Vegetative compatibility reactions were observed among isolates, but this was not correlated with the genetic clustering. Virulence assays proved that all isolates tested were pathogenic on grapevine stems. Differences in necrotic lesions lengths caused by D. mutila isolates were identified, indicating different virulence levels among isolates, however, no relationship was found between the genetic groups and the virulence. The results of the study indicated movement of D. mutila isolates between nurseries, vineyards, and other sources in New Zealand. This information will inform control strategies to limit the further spread of this pathogen into vineyards in the same region or new regions.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 The Author(s)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The content of VITIS is published under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. Any user is free to share and adapt (remix, transform, build upon) the content as long as the original publication is attributed (authors, title, year, journal, issue, pages) and any changes to the original are clearly labeled. We do not prohibit or charge a fee for reuse of published content. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in any publication herein, even if not specifically indicated, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations. The submitting author agrees to these terms on behalf of all co-authors when submitting a manuscript. Please be aware that this license cannot be revoked. All authors retain the copyright on their work and are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements.