A comparison of grapevine summer mottle and vein mosaic diseases

Authors

  • R. C. Woodham
  • L. R. Krake

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5073/vitis.1983.22.247-252

Abstract

Comparisons of grapevine summer mottle disease in Australia and of vein mosaic disease in France using source vines and graft-inoculated indicator vines in a glasshouse have demonstrated that the two diseases are not the same. Summer mottle contains a component different to that in vein mosaic. Two sources infected with vein mosaic did not induce any symptoms in V. vinifera indicators for summer mottle. However, the two sources and the summer mottle source induced identical symptoms in V. riparia cv. Gloire, an indicator for vein mosaic.
Natural spread of summer mottle in the field to an adjacent vine was recorded in only one instance.

Ein Vergleich von Grapevine summer mottle und Vein mosaic disease

Das in Australien vorkommende Grapevine summer mottle und das in Frankreich (Elsaß} verbreitete Vein mosaic sind keine identischen Krankheiten. Daß die auslösenden Agenzien der beiden Krankheiten sich unterscheiden, zeigten Gewächshausbeobachtungen an erkrankten Reben australischer und französischer Herkunft und Versuche zur Pfropfübertragung auf Indikatorreben. Zwei mit Vein mosaic infizierte Rebsorten lösten bei Indikatorreben (Vitis vinifera) keinerlei Symptome von Summer mottle aus. Diese beiden Sorten und die mit Summer mottle infizierte Sorte induzierten jedoch identische Krankheitssymptome bei V. riparia Gloire, einem Indikator für Vein mosaic.
Im Freiland wurde nur einmal die natürliche Ausbreitung von Summer mottle auf eine benachbarte Rebe festgestellt.

Downloads

Published

2016-02-08

Issue

Vol. 22 No. 3 (1983): Vitis

Section

Article

License

The content of VITIS is published under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. Any user is free to share and adapt (remix, transform, build upon) the content as long as the original publication is attributed (authors, title, year, journal, issue, pages) and any changes to the original are clearly labeled. We do not prohibit or charge a fee for reuse of published content. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in any publication herein, even if not specifically indicated, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations. The submitting author agrees to these terms on behalf of all co-authors when submitting a manuscript. Please be aware that this license cannot be revoked. All authors retain the copyright on their work and are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements.