JfK Kopfgrafik
Home / Archiv / Bd. 70 Nr. 8 (2018) / Originalarbeit
Originalarbeit

Variability of thousand grain weights of seed batches of important arable and some horticultural crops

Variabilität der Tausendkorngewichte von Saatgutchargen wichtiger landwirtschaftlicher und gartenbaulicher Kulturen

Udo Heimbach
Institute
Julius Kühn-Institut (JKI), Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Institute for Plant Protection in Field Crops and Grassland, Braunschweig, Germany

Journal für Kulturpflanzen, 70 (8). S. 250–254, 2018, ISSN 1867-0911, DOI: 10.1399/JfK.2018.08.03, Verlag Eugen Ulmer KG, Stuttgart

Correspondence
Dr. Udo Heimbach, Julius Kühn-Institut (JKI), Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Institute for Plant Protection in Field Crops and Grassland, Messeweg 11–12, 38104 Braunschweig, Germany, E-mail: udo.heimbach@julius-kuehn.de
Accepted
09 July 2018

Abstract

The thousand grain weight (TGW) of seeds used for sowing varies because of natural mass variation within and between cultivars of a crop but also because of selection of sizes of seeds used for propagation by breeders and seed suppliers. The range of TGW data of 55 arable crops and 26 horticultural crops are presented as well as TGW data for 15 types of pelleted seeds of different crops. In addition to the mean and maximum and minimum values, different percentiles were calculated for most crops. This study presents TGW data of seed batches used for cultivar testing (most arable crops) as well as of seed lots used for seed coating with pesticides for the European market in the period of the harvesting years 2011–2018.

Key words: Thousand grain weight, mean, percentile, variability, seed treatment, pesticide regulation

Zusammenfassung

Das Tausendkorngewicht (TKG) von Saatgut variiert natürlicherweise zwischen Sorten und Saatgutchargen aber auch durch Größensortierungen bei Züchtern und Saatguterzeugern. Die Spanne von TKG-Werten von 55 verschiedenen landwirtschaftlichen Kulturen, 26 Gemüsekulturen sowie von 15 Kulturen mit pilliertem Saatgut werden präsentiert. Neben Mittelwerten, Minimal- und Maximalwerten, wurden auch Perzentilwerte berechnet. Für die Zusammenstellung wurden die TKG Werte von Saatgutchargen landwirtschaftlicher Kulturen, die beim Bundessortenamt zur Aussaat für die Sortenprüfung der Erntejahre 2011 bis 2018 kamen und von zumeist gartenbaulichen Kulturen genutzt, die in einer kommerziellen Saatgutbehandlungsanlage für den europäischen Markt behandelt wurden.

Stichwörter: Tausendkorngewicht, Mittelwert, Perzentile, Variabilität, Saatgutbehandlung, Pflanzenschutzgesetz

Introduction

Seeds of many crops are treated with plant protection products (PPP) mainly to control fungal and insect pests. Dosing of PPP is expressed in amount of product either per number of seeds (e.g. per 1000 kernels or seed unit) or per mass of seeds (e.g. per kg or 100 kg). For a correct dosing during the treatment process the thousand grain weights (TGW) have to be taken into account in the case of dosing per unit. In the case of dosing per kg, the dose per seed can vary between seed lots of different TGW. Information on the TGW is not only required for correct dosing but also for assessing the risks of seed dressings for human health and the environment before the products are placed on the market. Exposure to toxicological relevant compounds in seed dressing products has to be estimated for operators handling the seed dressings and the treated seeds as well as for farmers sowing the treated seeds (EFSA, 2014). Treated seeds and contaminated dust are a source of exposure for bystanders, residents and the environment, which also has to be assessed to confirm a safe use of seed dressings. Treated seeds can also be consumed by birds and small mammals (e.g. EFSA, 2009). Therefore, it is important to have a realistic idea of the TGW values of different crops to assess exposure to humans and the environment. An analysis of the variability of TGW being used in the German market was carried out, which allows an improved assessment of potential risks of seed treatment products. There are TGW values recently published for different European countries (Lucchesi et al., 2016), but the validity of the TGW data is not clear and the values seem to be assessed often only very roughly and some even may be wrong. Therefore, the validated data of mainly German seed lots may be useful also for other European countries and at least for those regions with comparable climatic and agricultural conditions.

Material and methods

For most crops TGW data were used provided by the Federal Plant Variety Office in Germany, which is responsible for field evaluations for the official registration of cultivars. Breeders have to register new cultivars, which have to be tested over several years and at different locations. For the analysis all TGW data of seed lots sown by the Federal Plant Variety Office (data base 1, data input until 31st Dec 2017 into the internal web side) for the cultivar testings in the harvesting years 2011 to 2018 were used. Data of standard cultivars sown more than ones per year, were used only once for the analysis. TGW values were obtained by counting and balancing a minimum of 300 seeds (BSA data) or of 1000 seeds of each seed batch (SUET data).

A few specialized factories treat many other different types of seeds including the often small sized vegetable seeds with or without pelleting. Furthermore, seeds for the European market are often processed at these factories. Data of non-pelleted and pelleted seed batches of sugar beet and of several common horticultural crops were supplied by SUET Saat- und Erntetechnik GmbH (data base 2), a seed treatment company working for many breeders and for the international market and thus representing a wide variety of cultivars used in Europe and elsewhere.

Non-pelleted seeds of sugar beets may be of importance for risk evaluation during the seed treatment process only for operators exposed during the pesticide application, whereas the pelleted beet seeds are in addition relevant for the handling of treated seeds and exposure in the environment. TGW values of pelleted seeds as well as of non-pelleted seeds of sugar beets are less dependent on natural variation but more on variability during the industrial processing. TGW values of non-pelleted sugar and fodder beet seeds were taken from data of the Federal Plant Variety Office as well as of SUET.

Data of all years were pooled and mean, median, 95th and 90th as well as 5th and 10th percentiles were calculated using MS Excel. For crops for which less than 20 values were available, no percentiles were calculated. EPPO codes (https://gd.eppo.int/) for crops were used to ensure a definite identification of crops.

Results and discussion

The results are presented in Tables 1 (non-pelleted seeds) and 2 (pelleted seeds) and common English crop names are given. In addition, scientific names as well as the hie­rarchical organized EPPO codes are shown to enable clear information on the crop. The complete Tables 1 and 2 containing German common names, median and minimum and maximum values are available as online supplement. The TGW data of winter and spring forms of cereals and of non-pelleted sugar and fodder beet are quite near to each other and are presented individually and in a pooled form. For most other crops it is not clear, whether they may be pooled or better kept separate. However, pooling data for e.g. all types of cabbage crops results in a wider range of TGW for different seed batches.

Table 1. Thousand grain weights (TGW) of seed batches of important arable crop cultivars used in Germany and of some horticultural crops used for seed treatment for the European market, 2011–2018 (data base 1: seed batches for cultivar testing of the Federal Plant Variety Office in Germany/data base 2: seed batches used for commercial seed treatment for the European market at SUET, Eschwege, Germany). German common names, median and minimum and maximum values are shown in the online available supple­ment.

english common name

scientific name

EPPO Code

data base

mean

std

no

95th percen­tile

90th percen­tile

5th percen­­tile

10th percen­tile

arable crops

 

3ARAC

     

   

forage pea

Pisum sativum subsp. arvense

PIBSA

1

246.0

39.7

91

309.5

290.0

179.0

196.0

vining peas

Pisum sativum subsp. arvense

PIBSA

1

172.9

25.3

45

212.2

203.6

136.2

154.0

field bean

Vicia faba subsp. minor

VICFM

1

560.6

89.4

69

711.4

655.2

410.2

447.2

common vetch

Vicia sativa

VICSA

1

52.4

8.7

8

 

 

 

 

blue lupin

Lupinus angustifolius

LUPAN

1

146.7

23.2

45

186.2

179.1

116.4

119.4

white lupin

Lupinus albus

LUPAL

1

347.0

91.9

2

 

 

 

 

soybean

Glycine max

GLXMA

1

202.3

27.4

46

240.0

232.0

154.0

160.7

lucerne

Medicago sativa

MEDSA

1

2.02

0.20

21

2.30

2.23

1.70

2.01

red clover

Trifolium pratense

TRFPR

1

2.26

0.52

110

3.10

2.93

1.60

1.70

white clover

Trifolium repens

TRFRE

1

0.69

0.07

25

0.83

0.79

0.60

0.60

Egyptian clover

Trifolium alexandrinum

TRFAL

1

2.94

0.76

11

    

crimson clover

Trifolium incarnatum

TRFIN

1

3.69

0.40

5

    

birdsfoot trefoil

Lotus corniculatus

LOTCO

1

1.28

0.16

12

    

winter barley

Hordeum vulgare

HORVW

1

55.5

6.8

1397

67.0

64.0

44.5

46.4

spring barley

Hordeum vulgare

HORVS

1

56.4

5.4

538

65.0

63.0

47.0

49.0

all barley

Hordeum vulgare

HORVX

1

55.7

6.5

1935

66.0

64.0

45.0

47.0

winter wheat

Triticum aestivum

TRIAW

1

49.2

5.9

1700

58.8

56.4

38.8

41.2

spring wheat

Triticum aestivum

TRIAS

1

47.0

4.9

305

55.0

53.0

38.0

41.0

all wheat

Triticum aestivum

TRZAX

1

48.8

5.8

2005

58.0

56.0

38.7

41.0

winter durum wheat

Triticum durum

TRZDW

1

48.7

5.2

46

57.6

56.5

41.6

42.4

spring durum wheat

Triticum durum

TRZDS

1

53.7

7.4

77

66.1

63.0

43.2

44.6

all durum wheat

Triticum durum

3DWHC

1

51.8

7.1

123

63.0

60.2

42.0

43.5

spelt *

Triticum spelta *

TRZSP*

1

123.0

17.4

109

152.8

144.2

97.0

100.4

winter rye

Secale cereale

SECCW

1

37.3

5.9

423

47.7

45.0

28.3

30.3

spring rye

Secale cereale

SECCS

1

39.5

4.7

8

    

all rye

Secale cereale

SECCE

1

37.3

45.0

431

47.6

45.0

28.3

30.3

winter triticale

x Triticosecale rimpaui

TTLWI

1

52.6

6.9

396

64.0

61.8

40.2

43.3

spring triticale

x Triticosecale rimpaui

TTLSO

1

48.2

6.4

12

    

all triticale

x Triticosecale rimpaui

3TRIC

1

52.4

6.9

408

63.8

61.6

40.0

43.2

spring oat

Avena sativa

AVESA

1

43.6

5.5

185

52.8

50.0

36.0

37.0

maize

Zea mays

ZEAMX

1

289.8

39.1

1858

353.0

340.0

224.9

238.0

sweet corn

Zea mays subsp. saccharata

ZEAMS

2

122.0

18.1

50

155.4

152.2

102.7

102.7

sorghum

Sorghum bicolor

SORVU

1

31.6

4.1

73

38.0

37.0

25.0

27.0

sunflower

Helianthus annuus

HELAN

2

60.3

15.6

111

80.8

78.3

32.5

40.2

flax

Linum usitatissimum

LIUUT

1

6.82

0.92

34

8.50

7.94

5.56

5.73

sugarbeet, non-pelleted

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris var. altissima

BEAVA

1, 2

10.7

1.1

3164

12.5

12.1

9.0

9.4

fodder beet, non-pelleted

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris var. crassa

BEAVC

1, 2

11.6

2.8

191

16.7

16.1

8.1

8.6

all beet, non-pelleted

Beta vulgaris

3BEEC

1, 2

10.7

1.3

3355

12.7

12.2

8.9

9.3

winter rape

Brassica napus

BRSNW

1

5.58

1.14

1428

7.84

7.10

4.00

4.30

radish

Raphanus sativus subsp. oleiferus

RAPSO

1

13.2

2.4

220

17.2

16.7

9.7

10.4

winter turnip rape

Brassica rapa

BRSSA

1

4.51

0.34

24

4.90

4.90

4.01

4.05

cow cabbage

Brassica oleracea var. medullosa

BRSOM

1

4.03

0.70

11

 

 

 

 

brown mustard

Brassica juncea

BRSJU

1

2.57

0.85

8

 

 

 

 

white mustard

Sinapis alba

SINAL

1

6.92

0.99

193

8.30

8.10

5.40

5.80

bristle oat

Avena strigosa

AVESG

1

20.0

3.6

46

23.8

23.1

11.1

14.2

westerwolds rye­grass

Lolium multiflorum subsp. gaudini

LOLMG

1

3.84

0.98

77

5.35

5.23

2.60

2.70

perennial ryegrass

Lolium perenne

LOLPE

1

2.68

0.75

187

3.86

3.63

1.65

1.76

Italian ryegrass

Lolium multiflorum

LOLMU

1

3.66

1.00

265

5.06

4.90

2.30

2.40

hybrid ryegrass

Lolium × hybridum

LOLBO

1

3.76

0.66

21

4.42

4.42

2.20

3.14

meadow fescue

Schedonorus pratensis

FESPR

1

2.29

0.51

28

3.46

3.05

1.84

1.90

tall fescue

Schedonorus arundinaceus

FESAR

1

2.64

0.24

16

 

 

 

 

timothy

Phleum pratense

PHLPR

1

0.48

0.10

22

0.64

0.60

0.35

0.38

smooth-stalked meadowgrass

Poa pratensis

POAPR

1

0.32

0.10

15

 

 

 

 

cocksfoot

Dactylis glomerata

DACGL

1

1.12

0.14

22

1.41

1.30

0.95

0.98

festulolium

Festulolium sp.

FETSS

1

3.83

0.60

9

 

 

 

 

phacelia

Phacelia tanacetifolia

PHCTA

1

1.96

0.31

21

2.40

2.40

1.65

1.74

vegetables

 

3VEGC

        

onion

Allium cepa

ALLCE

2

3.94

0.44

1736

4.70

4.51

3.26

3.41

leek

Allium porrum

ALLPO

2

3.13

0.50

123

4.03

3.91

2.36

2.45

salad onion

Allium fistulosum

ALLFI

2

2.60

0.83

162

4.41

4.01

1.90

1.93

chives

Allium schoenoprasum

ALLSC

2

1.41

0.12

50

1.63

1.52

1.16

1.22

carrot

Daucus carota subsp. sativus

DAUCS

2

1.73

0.45

453

2.60

2.34

1.14

1.22

asparagus

Asparagus officinalis

ASPOF

2

10.8

2.4

44

15.4

14.8

7.8

8.2

radish

Raphanus sativus var. niger

RAPSN

2

12.3

2.3

36

14.9

14.5

7.1

9.6

small radish

Raphanus sativus

RAPSR

2

9.73

1.50

12

 

 

 

 

Cucurbita hybrids

Cucurbita hybrids

CUUHY

2

163.1

57.0

172

268.5

252.1

81.9

95.0

chicory

Cichorium intybus

CICIN

2

1.65

0.12

46

1.89

1.80

1.47

1.49

lettuce

Lactuca sativa

LACSA

2

0.99

0.18

48

1.28

1.24

0.68

0.75

white rocket

Diplotaxis erucoides

DIPER

2

0.28

0.02

340

0.32

0.31

0.24

0.25

spinach

Spinacia oleracea

SPQOL

2

10.8

2.4

44

15.4

14.8

7.8

8.2

beet root

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris var. conditiva

BEAVD

2

10.5

2.9

39

16.2

13.7

7.0

7.6

swiss chard

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris var. cicla

BEAVV

2

11.8

2.7

31

15.7

15.1

7.6

9.0

dill

Anethum graveolens

AFEGR

2

1.42

0.25

46

1.88

1.85

1.09

1.15

parsley

Petroselinum crispum

PARCR

2

1.87

0.38

153

2.54

2.40

1.34

1.43

basil

Ocimum basilicum

OCIBA

2

1.59

0.26

140

2.01

1.95

1.16

1.25

cauliflower

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis

BRSOB

2

4.44

1.05

36

5.92

5.57

2.56

3.39

broccoli

Brassica oleracea var. italica

BRSOK

2

5.36

0.77

19

 

 

 

 

kohlrabi

Brassica oleracea var. gongylodes

BRSOG

2

3.98

0.79

20

5.27

5.09

2.77

3.18

brussels sprouts

Brassica oleracea var. gemmifera

BRSOF

2

4.95

0.91

35

6.17

5.88

3.42

3.81

white cabbage

Brassica oleracea var. capitata

BRSOL

2

4.74

1.17

19

 

 

 

 

Chinese cabbage

Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis

BRSPK

2

3.39

0.74

53

4.51

4.41

2.39

2.46

turnip

Brassica rapa

BRSSP

2

2.29

0.40

43

2.72

2.59

1.51

1.64

swede

Brassica napus subsp. rapifera

BRSNA

2

2.86

0.49

21

3.38

3.37

2.08

2.20

all vegetable Brassicas

Brassica spp.

BRSOX

2

3.74

1.24

288

5.73

5.44

2.05

2.31

* TGW of spikeletes with 2–3 seeds including 20–30% glum

Table 2. Thousand grain weights (TGW) of pelleted seed batches used for commercial seed treatments for the Eu­ropean market by SUET, Eschwege, Germany (data base 2). German common names, median and mini­mum and maximum values are shown in the online available supplement.

type of pill

english common name

scientific name

EPPO Code

mean

std

no

95th percen­tile

90th percen­tile

5th percen­­tile

10th percen­tile

field pill

sugarbeet

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris var. altissima

BEAVA

30.2

2.8

3629

33.8

33.3

24.7

26.2

field pill

fodder beet

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris var. crassa

BEAVC

28.1

1.7

113

31.0

29.4

25.8

26.4

field pill

onion

Allium cepa

ALLCE

13.3

1.1

8

    

field pill

leek

Allium porrum

ALLPO

23.9

6.8

19

    

mini pill

carrot

Daucus carota subsp. sativus

DAUCS

5.58

0.42

17

    

field pill

carrot

Daucus carota subsp. sativus

DAUCS

10.8

2.4

44

15.4

14.8

7.8

8.2

field pill

small radish

Raphanus sativus

RAPSR

20.9

1.3

10

    

pot pill

types of vege­table Brassicas

Brassica spp.

BRSOX

25.6

1.8

40

28.0

27.4

22.9

23.3

field pill

types of vege­table Brassicas

Brassica spp.

BRSOX

10.1

3.5

13

    

field pill

chicory

Cichorium intybus

CICIN

9.46

0.41

43

10.12

10.02

8.87

8.98

field pill

lettuce

Lactuca sativa

LACSA

12.5

1.7

13

    

pot pill

lettuce

Lactuca sativa

LACSA

42.0

1.8

3

    

field pill

white rocket

Diplotaxis erucoides

DIPER

38.1

1.7

39

40.9

40.0

35.5

36.0

field pill

spinach

Spinacia oleracea

SPQOL

25.0

2.6

41

29.0

28.5

21.1

21.5

field pill

parsley

Petroselinum crispum

PARCR

10.3

1.1

19

    

The TGW values presented represent a large variety of different cultivars over several years and are of higher validity than TGW data published by EPPO (Lucchesi et al., 2016), which were handed to EPPO by country representatives and in some cases do not seem to be of high validity. The data seem not always to be of high validity, because even in adjacent countries TGW values were provided e.g. between 2 and 10 g for Linum sativum (LIUUT), 2 and 431 g for Pisum sativum (PIBSX) and 70 and 450 g for Lupinus spp. (LUPPS). However, diffe­rences in the TGW may also occur because of different use forms of a crop, e.g. LIUUT used for fibre or oil production or PIBSX used for fodder, for greening purpose or different vegetable uses. All data provided by the internationally active seed treatment company SUET may allow an easier use in the whole of Europe, because cultivars of different climatic zones are included. For data extrapolation between regions, more care has to be given to crops, such as maize with very different cultivars used in different climatic regions in Europe. Generally, the relevance of different TGW values for the risk assessment increases with the mass difference between 5th and 95th percentile values in relation to the mean weight. While for sugar beet and spring barley, both with many data points, this difference is less than 33% of the mean mass, the difference for other crops is more than 50%. Within crops with a sufficient high seed batch number (more than 200) the highest difference between 5th and 95th percentile in relation to the mean mass have seeds of carrots (DAUCS), Italian ryegrass (LOLMU), winter oilseed rape (BRSNW), radish (RAPSC) and winter rye (SECCW). The high seed mass variability for BRSNW and SECCW may be explained by the intensive breeding programs in this crop with hybrid and non-hybrid cultivars. Generally, for pelleted seeds the TGW variability is less compared to non-pelleted seeds. But it has to be taken into account that data of only one seed treatment company were available and that customers may demand different sized seed pills depending on the use type. However, regarding TGW values of pelleted sugar beet seeds other seed treatment facilities provided similar mean values as SUET.

Acknowledgements

Thanks to the Bundessortenamt (Federal Plant Variety Office) for the opportunity to use their TGW data of seed batches used for the cultivar testing of arable crops and to SUET (Jörn Dau) for TGW values of horticultural seeds as well as sugar and fodder beets.

References

EFSA (European Food Safety Authority): Guidance on the assessment of exposure of operators, workers, residents and bystanders in risk assessment for plant protection products. EFSA Journal 2014; 12(10):3874, 55pp. https://www.efsa.europa.eu/de/efsajournal/pub/3874.

EFSA (European Food Safety Authority): Guidance of EFSA. Risk Assessment for Birds and Mammals. EFSA Journal 2009; 7(12):1438, 139 pp. https://www.efsa.europa.eu/de/efsajournal/pub/1438.

Lucchesi, V., V. Zlof, U. Heimbach, 2016: Results of the EPPO Survey on dose expression for seed treatment and authorized dose for plant protection products in general. EPPO Bulletin 46, 618-624.


ISSN (elektronisch): 1867-0938
ISSN (print): 1867-0911
Verlag
Eugen Ulmer KG
Ulmer-Logo
Verantwortlicher Herausgeber
Präsident und Professor
Prof. Dr. Frank Ordon
Julius Kühn-Institut - Bundesforschungsinstitut für Kulturpflanzen
Erwin-Baur-Str. 27
06484 Quedlinburg
Schriftleitung
Dr. Anja Hühnlein
Julius Kühn-Institut - Bundesforschungsinstitut für Kulturpflanzen
Erwin-Baur-Str. 27
06484 Quedlinburg
E-Mail: journal-kulturpflanzen@julius-kuehn.de
Co-Schriftleitung
Dr. Ulrike Stahl
Julius Kühn-Institut - Bundesforschungsinstitut für Kulturpflanzen
Layout/Technische Umsetzung
mediaTEXT Jena GmbH
mediaTEXT-Logo
Julius Kühn-Institut (JKI)
Bundesforschungsinstitut für Kulturpflanzen
 
Erwin-Baur-Str. 27
06484 Quedlinburg
Deutschland
Fon: 03946 47-0
Fax: 03946 47-255
Mail: poststelle@julius-kuehn.de
De-Mail: poststelle@julius-kuehn.de-mail.de
Impressum
 
Diese Zeitschrift wird vom Julius Kühn-Institut herausgegeben.
JKI-Logo