Best combiners during 40 years of breeding <i>Vitis</i> cuitivars resistant to Pierce's disease

Authors

  • J. A. Mortensen
  • L. H. Stover

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5073/vitis.1990.29.special-issue.271-276

Keywords:

Pierce's disease, bacterium, Vitis, variety of vine, germplasm, resistance, breeding, inbreeding, parents, Florida, USA

Abstract

By breeding for resistance to Pierce's disease in Vitis we have obtained useful cultivars that can be grown productively in areas formerly considered unsuitable for grape production. Reviewing the most successful recombinants from crosses made between 1945 and 1984, 6 Vitis clones were prominent foundation parents among those tested as primitive resistant germplasm: V. aestivalis, ssp. smalliana cvs Fla. 43-47 and Fla. 449, V. aestivalis ssp. simpsoni cvs Pixiola and Fla. 451, and V. shuttleworthii cvs Haines City and Kissimmee. The best combiners for productivity, fruit size, and high quality were PD susceptible cultivars Aurelia, Carolina Blackrose, Cardinal, Exotic, Golden Muscat, and Villard blanc. The best combiners for seedlessness and early ripening were susceptible cultivars Lakemont and Perlette. Selection for resistance to PD required 7 or more years each generation for exposure of seedlings to PD-carrying vectors. Inbreeding was detrimental to vine vigor but good combiners were selected among inbred progeny which were more homozygous for disease resistance. Subsequent crosses of these inbreds to large-fruited, high-quality cultivars resulted in some recombinants with restored vigor and superior traits such as Blanc Du Bois.

Downloads

Published

2015-10-27

Issue

Vol. 29 (1990): Vitis (Special Issue)

Section

Section 3: Resistance/tolerance to pests and diseases

License

The content of VITIS is published under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. Any user is free to share and adapt (remix, transform, build upon) the content as long as the original publication is attributed (authors, title, year, journal, issue, pages) and any changes to the original are clearly labeled. We do not prohibit or charge a fee for reuse of published content. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in any publication herein, even if not specifically indicated, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations. The submitting author agrees to these terms on behalf of all co-authors when submitting a manuscript. Please be aware that this license cannot be revoked. All authors retain the copyright on their work and are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements.