Identification and characterization of Romanian grapevine genetic resources

Authors

  • C. F. Popescu National Research and Development Institute for Biotechnology in Horticulture Ştefāneşti-Argeş, România
  • E. Maul
  • L. C. Dejeu Faculty of Horticulture, University of Agronomical Science and Veterinary Medicine, Bucharest, România
  • D. Dinu Research and Development Station for Viticulture and Oenology Drāgāşani-Vâlcea, România
  • R. N. Gheorghe National Research and Development Institute for Biotechnology in Horticulture Ştefāneşti-Argeş, România
  • V. Laucou INRA, UMR 1334 AGAP, Equipe Diversité, Adaptation et Amélioration de la Vigne, Montpellier, France
  • T. Lacombe INRA, UMR 1334 AGAP, Equipe Diversité, Adaptation et Amélioration de la Vigne, Montpellier, France
  • D. Migliaro Council for Agricultural Research and Economics - Centre of Viticulture and Enology Research (CREA-VE), Conegliano (TV), Italy
  • M. Crespan Council for Agricultural Research and Economics - Centre of Viticulture and Enology Research (CREA-VE), Conegliano (TV), Italy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5073/vitis.2017.56.173-180

Keywords:

SSR, genotyping, autochthonous cultivars, synonyms, germplasm

Abstract

The research focused on old Romanian varieties of local distribution, with very limited growing area and also on those nowadays neglected, to identify, characterize and compare these cultivars with one another and on a larger geographic scale. Ampelografic characterization with 48 descriptors, photographs of shoot tip, leaf and bunch and genotyping using 13 SSR markers were applied together with literature references to confirm trueness to type. The sixty one accessions belonged to fifty one varieties. New synonymies were detected (e.g. 'Negru românesc' = 'Bātutā neagrā'; 'Cârcioasā' = 'Balint weiss'; 'Galbenā māruntā' = 'Kakotrygis'), assignments were modified (e.g. 'Galbenā uriaşā' = 'Mirkovaca' and ≠ 'Galbenā de Odobeşti' as previously assumed), misnomers identified and unique genotypes were detected which had never been described before. Molecular data supported previous pedigree relationships and allowed new parent-offspring hypotheses to be formulated. The results were shown to be useful for updating the information on old Romanian grapevine germplasm.  

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2017-10-05

Issue

Section

Article