Weed tolerance and weed-suppressing ability of blue lupin (<i>Lupinus angustifolius</i>)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5073/jka.2018.458.042Abstract
In the joint research project LupiBreed in 2015 the competitiveness of two blue lupin varieties (terminated type: Boruta, branched type: Boregine) and in 2016 additionally eight pre-breedinglines (two terminated, five branched, one intermediate) was examined. Variety-specific weed-suppressing ability and weed tolerance were tested with site-specific weeds and a mixture of “artificial weeds” (rapeseed, buckwheat, phacelia) at two sowing densities. Furthermore, weed suppression in mixed cropping systems with spring wheat, oat and false flax at two sowing densities was surveyed. Field trials were carried out at Thünen-Institute of Organic Farming with 3-fold replications. Plots were sampled at stem elongation, flowering and ripeness.
Weed tolerance, measured by means of lupin yield, differed at each sampling between varieties and prebreedinglines and was dependent on weed infestation at ripeness. Variety-specific weed suppression was only significant at ripeness. Weed tolerance and weed suppression were not distinctive between growth types. In summary, pre-breedingline 1-E, 4-V, 6-V and Boregine-V showed good competitiveness but the effect of the variety was not strong.
Mixed cropping reduced weed biomass dependent of lupin varieties and pre-breedinglines between 15 and 80 % compared to lupin sole cropping. Weed suppression was mainly influenced by partners and was significantly higher in mixed cropping with false flax than with spring wheat and oat.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attributed 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially
Under the following terms:
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits