Empirical comparison of different methods for correcting late blight (<em>Phytophthora infestans</em> (Mont.) de Bary) data for maturity in selection experiments of potato (<em>Solanum tuberosum</em> subsp. <em>tuberosum</em>)

Authors

  • Bernd Truberg <sup></sup>Julius Kühn-Institut - Bundesforschungsinstitut für Kulturpflanzen, Institut für Züchtungsforschung an landwirtschaftlichen Kulturen, Quedlinburg
  • Thilo Hammann <sup></sup>Julius Kühn-Institut - Bundesforschungsinstitut für Kulturpflanzen, Institut für Züchtungsforschung an landwirtschaftlichen Kulturen, Quedlinburg
  • Ulrich Darsow <sup></sup>Julius Kühn-Institut - Bundesforschungsinstitut für Kulturpflanzen, Institut für Züchtungsforschung an landwirtschaftlichen Kulturen, Quedlinburg
  • Hans-Peter Piepho Universität Hohenheim, Institut für Pflanzenbau und Grünland, Fachgebiet Bioinformatik, Stuttgart

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5073/JfK.2009.03.01

Keywords:

Solanum tuberosum, Phytophthora infestans, maturity-corrected resistance, BLUP, AUDPC, cluster analysis

Abstract

A comparison of different measures to calculate resistance against late blight in potato was accomplished by means of the multivariate statistical tool of cluster analysis. One group of measures was based on the BLUP technique (Best Linear Unbiased Prediction). The measure rAUDPC_3, which takes into consideration the maturity group of the respective genotype, is recommended to capture maturity-corrected resistance, because of less theoretical assumptions with otherwise similar behaviour as compared to the rest of the measures.

Published

2009-03-01

Issue

Section

Original Article